Add Messy to Checklists

I found a book that speaks to me: Yes to the Mess: Surprising Leadership Lessons from Jazz, by Frank J. Barrett.

I always try to be reading a non-fiction book that is not about lawyers or the law. My brain needs to meander in other directions after each day of battling hard to solve legal problems for my clients.

A few years ago I recommended lawyers read The Checklist Manifesto, a book by surgeon and polymath Atul Gawande. Some lawyers shy away from using checklists on the theory they discourage creative thinking. Gawande’s readable book makes a persuasive argument that well-thought checklists can help in nearly all professions. I started using checklists more often in my work.

But Yes to the Mess has an opposite thesis: that the Jazz ethic of loose structure, jam sessions and the willingness to make mistakes leads to creative and effective solutions in ways that rulebook checklists don’t.

As I do every year, last month I went to New York City to attend NACDL’s White Collar Crime Seminar at Fordham Law School. I like the format: all of the presentations are panel discussions, loosely led by a moderator (usually Gerry Goldstein or Abbe Lowell). Sometimes things get messy as the speakers stray off topic or argue with each other, but these are my favorite parts: I get to see smart trial lawyers thinking out loud.

In Yes to the Mess, Barrett makes this argument:
When you’re learning to be a professional, it’s not just a matter of memorizing a set of rules or a stock of explicit knowledge. Often what you are learning is an outlook, a mood, a disposition. You’re learning to absorb a whole way of being – picking up practices, rather than learning about practices. This learning is anything but clean, rote, or logically arranged. Learning to be a practicing musician, like learning to be a practicing executive, is a sloppy process. It’s intuitive and vague. You are guessing and adjusting, trying to grasp what to do next, listening to how others grapple with dilemmas, imitating the phrases and facial expressions of admired peers, trying something based on vague glimpses and threads of meaning – and, critically, reorienting as you go.

Listening to the lawyer jam sessions up at Fordham, I picked up four ideas I think can help me on cases I’m working on right now. (I’m usually happy when I pick up one idea per seminar.)

One of the tasks I do in every hard case is to go to Starbucks, leave the phone in the car, and sit down with just a blank legal pad to think and chart out defenses and strategies. I guess this is a one-man jam session.  After reading Barrett’s book, I’m going to add one more item to my case checklist: more brainstorming sessions with my law partners and colleagues.

Recent Blogs

Half way to Joe!
July 11, 2022
PPP Loan Fraud Investigations and Why the 5th Amendment is Your Friend
February 23, 2022
Fighting the Good Fight
October 28, 2020
It’s good when a plan comes together – thoughts about being named white-collar lawyer of the year.
September 22, 2020
Won’t I Look Guilty if I Hire a Lawyer?
March 5, 2020
New Rule: The Kitchen Table Meal
February 28, 2020
Defending the Constitution One Client at a Time
December 17, 2019
Over-Informing My Clients
December 1, 2019
Tom Petty, “It Won’t Take But a Minute”, and Redemption at Jail North
May 21, 2018
Damned if You Do, Broke if You Don’t
February 6, 2018
Colleges Value Avoiding Trauma Over Finding Truth
June 6, 2016
Two articles that keep me thinking
March 11, 2012
An American Moment
January 24, 2012
Patriot James Otis Helps the Fourth Circuit
November 25, 2011
The Wail of Man Mins
November 14, 2011
Innocence Case Victory
November 9, 2011
You know you’re getting old when your classmate is elected D.A.
November 3, 2010
Tiger versus Me
April 9, 2010
New Jersey versus Medical Marijuana
January 12, 2010
The Charlotte Observer versus Peter Gilchrist
December 17, 2009

Let us help.

Call Chris Fialko at 704-458-5415

Email him at

We do not charge for initial meeting.